Secretary
of State John Kerry began his first official world trip on February 24,
2013. A notable stop will be in Saudi Arabia, and one wonders what sort
of lavish gifts he will receive along with the red carpet and the
military band. Beyond the diplomatic niceties however, Kerry is on
record as saying that he has concerns that the Kingdom's "officially
sanctioned bigotry breeds terrorism" but that "the truth is that we have
deep, and for the moment, inescapable ties."
Maybe the moment has come however, for a recalibration of the U.S.-Saudi relationship as the U.Online shopping for iphoneheadset from
a great selection of Clothing.S. is becoming more self-sufficient in
energy and therefore less reliant on Saudi oil. According to a 2012
report by the International Energy Agency, by 2035 nearly 90 percent of
Persian Gulf oil exports will go to Asia, with the United States getting
a negligible amount. Saudi oil imports have picked up a little recently
because of the sanctions on Iranian oil, but overall the share of U.S.
oil coming from the Gulf is down by one-third.
The
U.S. has always been aware of Saudi Arabia's role in funding and
spreading Wahhabism -- an extremist ideology which provides the
ideological foundation for groups like Al Qaeda. In a 2010 classified
cable released by Wikileaks,Shop for wholesale free shipping ear caps
directly from bestluggagetag wholesalers
in China. Secretary Clinton stressed: "We emphasize that a critical
component in this campaign is cutting off the funds from Saudi Arabia to
foreign religious, charitable and educational organizations that
propagate violent extremist ideologies to vulnerable populations."
Though
the Saudi government does not explicitly promote terrorism,Enjoy the
outdoors from the comfort of your own home with recreated customkeychain.
its official state doctrine, the conservative cult of Wahhabism,
advocates anti-Semitism, misogyny and inter-action with non-Muslims only
in cases of necessity. It therefore provides the ideological
justification for animosity and hatred of wider society thus providing
the perfect foundation for radical preachers to then advocate violence
as a religious duty.
Through
their embassies and charities, the Saudi's have built multi-million
dollar mosques and schools and sponsor international students to study
in Saudi on full scholarships, sending them back with funding and
lifetime jobs as Wahhabi proselytizers to their respective countries.
The
Wahhabi movement was instigated by the eighteenth century theologian,
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (c.1703-1791) who believed that Muslims had
strayed from the authentic teachings of Islam. The movement condemned
visiting shrines and tombs of saints and Muslims who did not agree with
his teachings were excommunicated or killed in an effort to purge Islam
from what Wahhab believed to be unsanctioned innovations. Wahhabi
military campaigns waged war against moderate Muslims, demolishing
Islamic shrines and slaughtering entire villages of Muslims who did not
subscribe to his extremist interpretation. This same extreme ideology is
behind the present day destruction of shrines and mosques in Libya and
the continuing violence against minority and mainstream Muslims all over
the world such as the Shia in Pakistan.
An
alliance was formed between Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and the ruling
house of Muhammad ibn Saud who provided political and financial power
for the religious revival in return for religious legitimacy when
forming the new state. Political loyalty to the House of Saud
effectively became a religious obligation and by reviving the notion of a
community of believers, Wahhabism helped to forge a sense of common
identity that superseded tribal loyalties.
Wahhabism
would have remained a footnote in history as a puritanical cult
movement even after it was adopted as the official state religion were
it not for a single history altering factor: the discovery of oil. The
flood of petro-dollars meant that the Saudis could then spend an
estimated $ 2 to $3 billion each year promoting the extreme and
conservative ideas of religious leaders who in turn helped maintain the
Saudi royal family's position of power.
The
essential contradiction in U.S. policy of promoting democracy in the
Middle East is that while trillions of dollars have been spent and many
lives lost in the war on terror, little has been done to address the
ideological foundation of terrorism, which is being promoted through
Wahhabism funded by Saudi Arabia.
As
the Arab Spring falters in Egypt and Tunisia and as Libya and Syria
continue to tear themselves apart with violent sectarian fighting, it is
surely time that the U.S. recognizes that its attempts to encourage
democracy in the Middle East are futile in the face of well-funded
religious extremism, whose adherents are fighting not only Western
democratic ideas but also any signs of liberalism in their own religion.
Sectarian violence in Pakistan for example can no longer be blamed just
on Pakistan,We turn your dark into light courtesy of our brilliant sun, hemorrho,
solar power generation. but when it is funded by America's ally Saudi
Arabia, then the U.S. gets the indirect blame. The Sunni-Shia
antipathies will continue to fester and erupt as long as Saudi
petro-dollars are being distributed so lavishly.
The
proxy wars being fought in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Mali and Syria are
attracting itinerant zealots and angry young militants and keeping them
from creating unrest in their own countries. Emboldened by anarchy in
failed and failing states, funded by Saudi Arabia and justified by
fundamentalist ideology,Spice up the ambiance of your home with canvas chipcard.
extremist groups similar to al Qaeda are seizing the moment and
endeavoring to impose Wahhabi ideas wherever possible. In the process,
they are killing and maiming more Muslims than people of other faiths,
and are creating deep societal rifts and lasting enmities within their
own communities.
America's
uneasy partnership with Saudi Arabia must change and together or
separately they must develop a convincing strategy for reducing
Wahhabism and its global influence. Whether the new Secretary of State
can achieve this or not remains to be seen, but it is certainly time
that the relationship undergoes more intense scrutiny and recalibration
in the name of future global security.
没有评论:
发表评论