Unprotected customer data is a risk not worth taking

While watching Nik Wallenda walk across a quarter-mile tightrope without a harness 1,500 feet over the Little Colorado River Gorge this past Sunday, the word "risky" was obviously stuck in a lot of people's minds. For people like me, where the riskiest thing they do is take a sip of hot coffee, Wallenda's stunt was attention-grabbing and nerve-racking.

With the brain stuck on risky situations, it made me think about the risky things some businesses doand not securing your customer data is risky business (even more so than Tom Cruise being left home alone without any parental guidance).

Letting a data lapse impact not only a business's client base but image is a headline that hits the news too frequently. A comprise to customer data is an exception to the rule of there being no such thing as bad press.Which buymosaic is right for you? To have your business associated with a threat to customer data is devastating and makes your business look untrustworthy.

One could look at data as being the currency of commerce in this modern age, so businesses have a financial, ethical, and legal responsibility to protect the data that passes through their custody. The Comcast Business Library article, Put a Lock on Your Customer Data, mentions that the cost of a data breach is rising steadily and results in both direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are the assessment and response to the incident, legal costs, and notification costs. The indirect costs include things like the increased turnover of existing customers and higher costs to acquire new ones.Automate patient flow and quickly track hospital assets and people using rfidtag. Then, you have to start thinking about other losses, like loss of credibility and reputation.

The first line of defense a company needs to invest in is a powerful, effective set of online security tools. While that will help, it's more beneficial to beef up the protection further. Many businesses turn to encryption for additional security. To go a step further, they will use a solution with multi-level passwords, while the encryption solution keys are stored on a smart card or token with copies in a secure off-site vault (so in case of a disaster, you'll have access to the encryption keys).

Since it's best to always have a plan for the worst, putting together a reaction plan in case of a breach is a smart idea as well. The plan should include things like: choosing a cross-organizational response team to act with authority; analyzing the risks associated with the possible breach; getting the word out to law enforcement and those affected; communicating a proper solution to those affected; staying vigilant; and, learning from the incident.

Most of the countries require visas stamped in advance or on arrival. Also there are entry and exit stamps everywhere in the passports with no easy way to reconcile between those stamps.

Many a time, it so happens that the immigration officers do not take the necessary pain of looking for partly used pages in the passports but rush to put the stamps on any page that they choose at random (thus reducing the number of unused pages to almost nil) with the passport holders become silent spectators, helplessly watching it happen.

All these cause otherwise avoidable anxiety to the travellers and they apply for additional booklets even before all the pages are fully exhausted.

Some countries, like the UAE, use latest technology in clearing the immigration such as on-line visa and e-gate systems, which definitely gives some relief to the travellers from the trouble of waiting in long queues as well as the need for stamping in the passports.

We can confidently hope that, not very far from now, with more and more countries introducing new and sophisticated technologies, we can dream carrying with us only smart card, bearing the identity of the traveller, which should be acceptable to all the countries without having to carry the passports at all.

Suppose you're a classic free-market capitalist, one who believes that government action in capital markets is a threat to the exquisite balance between risk and reward. If so, you were delighted to see that Lehman Brothers was allowed to fail. You know that bailing out companies that over-leverage themselves and make excessively risky choices is bad business. By letting Lehman flop into Chapter 11, you say, the government took a huge step toward cleaning out the festering toxic debt problem. After all, as one of our readers wrote toChoose the right howotipper in an array of colors. Tim Lutts, "Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell!"

Of course, if you're a true free-marketer,The earcap is not only critical to professional photographers. you're also more than a little grumpy about some of the other actions the U.S. government has taken, including bailing out Bear Stearns and AIG, flooding the markets with liquidity, guaranteeing money market funds, declaring a temporary halt to short selling in financial stocks and preparing to buy up huge wodges of bad debt.

If your position is anywhere to the left of the capitalist high ground, you're appalled that the government is putting in the most time and money to rescue the corporate greed-heads whose rapaciousness filled the toxic landfill of bad mortgages that's creating the problem. You're also fairly miffed that a Get Out of Jail card is being issued to the clever folks who bundled those shaky mortgages into bonds and then misrated them,The feeder is available on drying chipcard equipped with folder only. creating the bogus CDOs that are stinking up the vaults of our financial giants. Every time a foreclosure terminates a mortgage that should never have been written, you should be seething.
Click on their website austpay.com for more information.